Péter Szilágyi pfp
Péter Szilágyi
@karalabe.eth
This is called conflict of interest. When every bot is paying you $5 a year, you are definitely not going to get rid of them. Don't blame the "consumer". Filtering out every single new user by default is just dumb. It makes it almost impossible for new users without a social circle already on FC to start out.
0 reply
11 recasts
112 reactions

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
Genuine question - what do you think we should be doing instead?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Péter Szilágyi pfp
Péter Szilágyi
@karalabe.eth
Be honest about how many real users you have. You are currently selling the bots are users. Sure, technically bots are also users... just not really what people come here for, so whilst technically correct, it's disingenuous. https://warpcast.com/dwr.eth/0xf073853b
3 replies
1 recast
1 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
> how many real users you have What methodology would you use to do this? What other social networks do this well?
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Péter Szilágyi pfp
Péter Szilágyi
@karalabe.eth
I don't know, I'm not the one building it. Have *you* tried differentiating users and bots and reporting the findings?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Define bot? Programmatic access and posting? Or non-English speaking person using a phone liking stuff that's posted in a Telegram group hoping for an airdrop from someone? Is your definition of "user" = "people that are interesting to me"? Because no other social network defines DAU like that. :)
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions