Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
"I'm not a spammy, I'm a real person not a bot." or "Just use proof of humanity to solve spam." 1. Spam is relative: you might not find something spammy but another person might find it spammy. 2. If you are casting in your home feed or to people who chose to follow you, then it's by definition not spammy 3. If you are casting *at* someone else, then their opinion does matter. It's no different than walking up to someone on the street and trying to strike up a conversation with them. 4. Fundamentally, spam is unwanted inbound that tries to get someone's attention (literally what spam email is). 5. Humans can be spammy and bots can be not spammy. 6. What proof of humanity does is limits how fast new accounts can get created, i.e. if you want to create 1000 accounts, you now have to get 1000 proof of humanity credentials. That's friction. 7. However, if you have proof of humanity, you can still be spammy (and still hook your account up to ChatGPT, etc.).
18 replies
6 recasts
45 reactions

aferg pfp
aferg
@aaronrferguson.eth
Funny how foreign a concept point #3 is to many people for some reason
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions

nicholas 🧨  pfp
nicholas 🧨
@nicholas
you’re mostly correct, but as someone receiving dubious replies, i do care if they are human or not. if a person has human looking credentials with the same username across several web2 properties, i’ll give them more patient attention than a bot posting the same content. yes they can hook that account to gpt but they can only do so a couple times as establishing web of human looking mutual across various web2 properties for the same username for example is time consuming and likely not worth it. you’re wrong that this introduces friction to sign ups because you offer this as an optional badge and reply ranking prioritization factor, not a barrier to entry to the network i realize there’s very little point telling you this because this is exactly the type of topic where you’ve formed what you believe to be the correct deep opinion and dismiss anyone who disagrees with your conclusion
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Daisy✨ pfp
Daisy✨
@dazedaisy
Spam isn’t subjective to proof of humanity 100% One thing to note is apart from constantly replying users without a response, and being reported by another user is there any other way a user can get marked as spam?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Alberto Ornaghi pfp
Alberto Ornaghi
@alor
What are the users complaining about? Spammy bots/humans with top level cast in channels or in replies? The spam flag is per account or per cast? Re: #2 if you are a spammer so are all you casts (even in home feed)?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Push 🎩🤌🏻 pfp
Push 🎩🤌🏻
@push-
I know well seen spammers. Sooooo not up to POH. This must be so challenging ngl
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

eirrann | he/him🎩🔵 pfp
eirrann | he/him🎩🔵
@eirrann.eth
Thoughts about this approach? Is it methodologically sound? Areas for improvement? https://warpcast.com/eirrann.eth/0x1ab2fed9
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

22 pfp
22
@themuyideen.eth
But isn't “unwanted inbound” subjective? Who decides what's unwanted, unless the affected users are reporting
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Double D pfp
Double D
@daved
So what’s to be done for the people who’s spent forever on the spam list They need to get out(provided there’s hope for that)or create a new account
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

𝖉𝖞𝖈𝖕¹ᵍ pfp
𝖉𝖞𝖈𝖕¹ᵍ
@tn100x.eth
@munaiscool start here 😆
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

helladj™ pfp
helladj™
@helladj.eth
Spam from bots*
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

daivd 🎩👽 ↑ pfp
daivd 🎩👽 ↑
@qt
Claude's interpretation - I think it mostly gets the point. Only feed it the "I'm not spammy, I'm a real person not a bot" cast, not the original
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

juanpriahitam.base.eth pfp
juanpriahitam.base.eth
@juanpriahitam
How can user interact on this apps if everything got labeled as a spam. Especially for user with 10 or 20 followers, they try so hard to got attention from other user's but all this apps do is marking they as a spam account. They pay $5 just for being a bot in here? Funny
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Mike | Abundance pfp
Mike | Abundance
@abundance
If a user doesn't respond to someone else that in itself doesn't necessarily make the reply spammy though. This is especially true for users who get lots of replies and cannot possibly keep track of them all.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Adam pfp
Adam
@adamneo.eth
Im really trying to find the balance. I appreciate you laying this out for us and Ill keep trying my best.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

meta-david🎩 | Building Scoop3 pfp
meta-david🎩 | Building Scoop3
@metadavid
“I’m not a spammer. I just cast a lot.”
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Rafaello.base.eth pfp
Rafaello.base.eth
@rafaello12
But if people want to get 1000 accounts, then they should be willing to get 1000 proof of identity
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Eren🎩 pfp
Eren🎩
@baeshy.eth
When you share all 30 signal models of “spam filter” please ping me I’m really interested in this whole thread
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

zenxosa◼️Ⓜ️🎩  pfp
zenxosa◼️Ⓜ️🎩
@zenxosa
What if you genuinely enjoy a creator’s content and you keep casting “at” them just because of that? Where is the line between pestering and wanting genuine interactions like on any other social apps? Because my takeaway from this is if i keep replying a caster and i don’t get replies i’m supposed to stop replying them so i don’t become spam regardless of if i want to or not
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction