Dan Romero on Warpcast

Dan Romero pfp

We’re working on a major overhaul for channels that doesn’t require a bunch of negative moderation from hosts. Goal is to make a host’s job about highlighting great content. Will also make it more feasible to decentralize channels sooner.

21 replies

22 recasts

499 reactions

Sam (crazy candle person) ✦ pfp

Sam (crazy candle person) ✦

Any way to stop the $samantha spam on my personal channel? https://warpcast.com/~/channel/samantha

3 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

Toady Dark pfp

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

wizard not parzival pfp

wizard not parzival

bring boosts back ?

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

shazow pfp

I wish more social networks used a mempool approach, hoping that's what you landed on!

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

links 🏴 pfp

Nice! Channels have always been the “killer app” for me (more than frames or GCs), so I’m glad you’re back to polishing them

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

yangwao ↑ pfp

Will there be a possibility to sort?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Deployer pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

HadiFab pfp

I think since the beginning it should have been like channel creation ideas not literally owning the channel, I'm not against moderation because I see lots of spams but it seems some users got some complaints about mod's personal preference on the contents which is not so good

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Ben Roy pfp

Stoked to see it

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

David pfp

@promptrotator.eth

Are you thinking of doing spam detection and removal at the protocol level? /xmtp had this proposal recently for a similar problem: https://community.xmtp.org/t/xip-42-universal-allow-and-block-preferences/544

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

GIG☀️ pfp

The problem is in that situation it becomes about who the mods “like” and don’t like Even when a mod doesn’t like someone, it’s almost never deep enough to stop someone’s posts from trending or similar However, when he doesn’t like someone, he will not do something that boosts it either

0 reply

0 recast

4 reactions

Zeus pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

junior {🟦,🎩} pfp

junior {🟦,🎩}

@maskarachico.eth

will them be gated, all of em?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Steter pfp

While I see the point, have to say that as a non spamming/endemic F4F user, what happens currently is that only those who have spammed enough to gain a lot of followers (although not interested in each other's content) get interactions, not good for the variety of content. Will that not keep penalising normal users?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Nour Ba pfp

Shipping 🚢🛳️

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

billyTRILLions pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

sartocrates🃏 pfp

sartocrates🃏

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

SchmRdty.eth 🎩 pfp

SchmRdty.eth 🎩

So a “token gated system based on community a moderated system of renewal” could be feasible? Or similar to what I mentioned a month or so ago?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Jack Maschka pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction