DucFlow.base.eth pfp

DucFlow.base.eth

@ductour

147 Following
133 Followers
Marc Andreessen pfp
Marc Andreessen
@pmarca
If you want to fix a broken system, you have to pull money OUT, not put more money IN. If you put more money IN, the system interprets it as a reward and uses the money to become even more broken. We get this for businesses. We forget it for nonprofits and governments. 🤔
0 reply
167 recasts
288 reactions
Haole pfp
Haole
@haole
I have to say @jtgi left an invaluable asset for the community. I forked the code and made a few modifications, it now works perfectly for future channel member moderation! I'm going to create a frame, so hopefully, everyone can auto-invite members from Day 1 based on rules you set. code is here: https://github.com/kale5195/automod
20 replies
156 recasts
276 reactions
DucFlow.base.eth pfp
DucFlow.base.eth
@ductour
Bought Doodles Certified Viral: Virtual Reality Check
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
DucFlow.base.eth pfp
DucFlow.base.eth
@ductour
minted my /farcards
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
DucFlow.base.eth pfp
DucFlow.base.eth
@ductour
you ok?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Reown (prev. WalletConnect Inc.) pfp
Reown (prev. WalletConnect Inc.)
@reown
We're excited to launch the Reown Guild 🏰 — a space to show our appreciation for the Reown community, powered by @guildxyz Join for free, claim roles, and start collecting stars ⭐ → https://guild.xyz/reown
1 reply
6 recasts
21 reactions
nikolaii.base.eth 🚀 pfp
nikolaii.base.eth 🚀
@nikolaiii
Check the network:farcaster Fan Token Stats. This chart looks amazing.
5 replies
2 recasts
12 reactions
DucFlow.base.eth pfp
DucFlow.base.eth
@ductour
Vừa rồi thì phải
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
DucFlow.base.eth pfp
DucFlow.base.eth
@ductour
Huhu 😭😢😲
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Project naming be like
5 replies
86 recasts
429 reactions
Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
It's dangerous to encourage people to believe false things (or quietly fail to correct false beliefs) if they lead to correct conclusions though. Such strategies may work in the short term, but the world is chaotic, and generally a wrong-but-helpful belief today will become a wrong-and-harmful belief tomorrow. We learned this with the whole 2020-era attempt to try to convince people that covid is not airborne so that people would not hoard masks and leave them for emergency staff. It ended up leading to really harmful misconceptions that are still persisting.
0 reply
10 recasts
192 reactions
DucFlow.base.eth pfp
DucFlow.base.eth
@ductour
$reward húpppppp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
I suspect the wisdom is in knowing when to zoom in and become hyper-involved in any specific thing and when to zoom back out to only tracking it at a high level so your attention can go elsewhere.
1 reply
22 recasts
156 reactions
DucFlow.base.eth pfp
DucFlow.base.eth
@ductour
Oh yeah baby
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
One way to look at the possible effects of deepfakes in politics is to look at "shallow fakes" that have been possible for a long time. For example, this screenshot purporting to be a "you're free to say whatever nasty stuff you want" whitelist for twitter. I actually have no idea if this is real or fake, but there definitely are some people who are treating it as real, imo without sufficient evidence. And yet, the effects of things like this are pretty bounded. This feels like a plausible outcome for deepfakes in politics. The smart people know not to trust a politician's statements without confirmation on official channels, and less smart people get tricked, as they do today with shallow fakes. If something fake goes viral, Community Notes can help on the margin in making it clear that it's fake. Most normies don't actually look at this stuff in real time, and so the effect ends up not too bad. This is the strongest case for not being too worried. The place where I am *more* worried about deepfakes is...
3 replies
193 recasts
865 reactions
Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
I am noticing that the most successful new ideologies of the past decade are very object-level (prescriptions on specific issues) and quite little meta-level (social processes for making decisions on object-level issues). Examples: * Abstract libertarianism feels much weaker than 10 years ago. But issue-specific versions of it are quite successful: YIMBY (housing), the crypto space * e/acc (it's about all technology in theory, but ends up being about AI in practice) * The largest cluster in effective altruism morphed from being meta-level ("think harder to making sure your donations are going where they can do the most good!") to object level (AI safety, with a little bit of animal welfare and global public health) * Longevity movement Maybe network states and Glen and Audrey's Plurality movement are two exceptions - but in general the above feels like a strong pattern. Any ideas why this meta level -> object level shift seems to be taking place?
11 replies
261 recasts
1363 reactions
Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
My hot take re "too much investment in infra": there's too much investment in *some kinds of infra* and not enough in others, and what's actually going on is, people want to invest in "the casino" but still feel good about themselves, so they invest in the subset of infra that gets spillover profits from the casino.
6 replies
132 recasts
749 reactions
DucFlow.base.eth pfp
DucFlow.base.eth
@ductour
Chi phí chìm và chi phí cơ hội. Hãy luôn ghi nhớ.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
DucFlow.base.eth pfp
DucFlow.base.eth
@ductour
Nằm ngủ tiếng mưa. Ngủ ngon.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
DucFlow.base.eth pfp
DucFlow.base.eth
@ductour
Con người bản chất là tốt hay xấu? Hay không có tốt và xấu. Chỉ là các lựa chọn dựa trên sự "phát triển" - "Tiến Hóa"...??
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction