ace
@ace
for social apps, is there anything lighter than giving "likes-equivalent"? if there is nothing, what could be a good feeling to design around for the interaction btw viewing and like (+1, I feel you, etc)? view < ??? < like < comment < bookmark
15 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
dtb
@dtb
In the context of p2p: - A “post” is a `ping` - A “view” is an unopinionated `pong` - A “like” is an opinionated `pong`; find peers - A “comment” is a `handshake` - `Subscribe` to peers is a “follow” - `Process` peer events is a “repost” / “bookmark” Idk if a step b/w views & likes is neede
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
dtb
@dtb
It looks like this is the approach Twitter is taking! I’m not saying it’s necessarily the same logic I noted, but they’re adding “view” count to tweets since over 90% of users simply read without interacting. Its a valid datapont that should be publicly readable https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/16059578111
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
