Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Barry
@baz.eth
Hey all - just wanted to share some of my concerns about the public nature of our casts/behavior on FC. Hoping for an open dialogue on where we think this is headed, and in the long run, how to provide privacy protections from a user content perspective. https://paragraph.xyz/@barrycollier/farcaster-content-graph
20 replies
9 recasts
46 reactions
GIGAMΞSH
@gigamesh
Good read! Hoping there are encrypted channels in the future, but I think the default open data will foster a collective immune system against the abuse that happens on centralized networks. Ex: Strong digital identity/reputation + a norm of only trusting media signed by a reputable source.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Barry
@baz.eth
Thanks for reading! Channel-level privacy was an interesting idea, and was something I was going to bring up to @dwr.eth once I formulated my thoughts around it. I'm definitely not a proponent of centralized networks. I'm less concerned about the individual one-off abuse and more concerned about the masses at scale
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Barry
@baz.eth
Just thinking long-term, who are the users on FC? How big does FC get? If it's in the 10's/100's of millions, it will include mainstream users w/o skills or understanding, and it exposes them to bad actors (e.g., mis/disinformation, etc.) If we don't expect FC to reach that scale, it's only an isolated nuisance.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
CarCulture.eth🎩 🔵
@drivr.eth
Plan to scale. If you’re thinking about it, it’s an issue
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
