@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
dogwifgun
@dogwifgun
@vitalik recently wrote an excellent piece on how memecoins can be better (charity coins and robinhood games): https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2024/03/29/memecoins.html While many memecoins donate to charity, his idea of robinhood games remains a new and vastly unexplored space.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
dogwifgun
@dogwifgun
We believe that $WIG (and the Conquest game) is the first memecoin that falls under Vitalik’s definition of a robinhood game. While a “meaningful and fun” game is ultimately up to players to decide, the economics of Conquest is designed to be positive-sum and value creating.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
dogwifgun
@dogwifgun
A positive-sum launch mechanic makes the average participants better off, compared to the fundamental zero-sum nature of traditional memecoins. Although this is still just a theory and an experiment, we think there are three key elements of why the IPvPO model is positive-sum.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
dogwifgun
@dogwifgun
First reason: As Vitalik astutely points out in his article, “fun can be positive sum”. But beyond just a sense of fun, players are willing to spend a lot of feelings of progress, achievement and status, with zero expectations of financial return. The F2P games market thrives on this dynamic.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction