ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
this is meaningfully concerning. TikTok is a great platform for entertainment, and a terrible one for news. its capacity to cause harmful social contagions is unparalleled. vids have 3 secs to capture attention (10 words) with zero way to fact check content (unlike community notes), and the algo boosts controversy.
14 replies
2 recasts
35 reactions
not parzival pfp
not parzival
@alexpaden
can you dive deeper into why it's concerning? I think of it like 10 second videos or 0 seconds of news
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
10 seconds of propaganda is still 0 seconds of real news
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
not parzival pfp
not parzival
@alexpaden
if the real news is 10 minutes of saying a school was shot up, why is 10 seconds worse? if the story is a school being shot up, the political propaganda is white, black, christian, muslim, incel, left, right, and etc i see it as depth vs breadth mostly. maybe the everything app will help
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
the same reason we discourage someone from reciting headlines if they haven't actually read the story behind the headline.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
not parzival pfp
not parzival
@alexpaden
i think this argument can probably be scaled to a single article, book, and everything short of a jury trial. two contradictory headlines probably give a better perspective than one targeted full-length content piece it sounds more like the case for community notes than non-short form content
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
wake pfp
wake
@wake.eth
Nah. Contradictory statements produce no information whatsoever. It is the case that (X attacked Y) It is not the case that (X attacked Y) And yet human brains will prefer one over the other. We don't process information in a way suitable to ten second sound bites, no matter the topic.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
not parzival pfp
not parzival
@alexpaden
X attacked Y, & did not is a cope Y was attacked by X because of … X was in the right because of … Y is wrong because of … Y attacked Z because of X Y and Z have historically fought before X Y sees themselves as correct because of … I disagree with Y’s reasoning because of … How old are you? You or we?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
not parzival pfp
not parzival
@alexpaden
@ditti gpt*^9 dismantle the arguments above and share your input. Specifically on news, propaganda, and short form content. Also explore content length by age, and the value or non-value of contradictory headlines
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ditti pfp
ditti
@ditti
https://i.imgur.com/wmsakHH.png
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction