Jack Dishman pfp
Jack Dishman
@dish
clanker team just shipped our v0.0.2 token factory this enables: + DEGEN, CLANKER, HIGHER, ANON pairings + ERC20Votes + change which address gets rewards + configurable fee splits (3-ways) + allowlisted addresses to deploy (batch txns) + burnable ๐Ÿ”ฅ Still needs dev work for this on UI/AI s/o @yungwknd ๐Ÿ‘‘
20 replies
33 recasts
168 reactions

Jack Dishman pfp
Jack Dishman
@dish
CA: https://basescan.org/address/0x732560fa1d1a76350b1a500155ba978031b53833
0 reply
2 recasts
12 reactions

Stuart pfp
Stuart
@olystuart
Can you specify a recipient wallet in the deployment cast or is that an after the fact edit? Anyway this is awesome, new possibilities. ๐ŸŽฉโœŒ๏ธ
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions

Trebor๐ŸŽฉ๐ŸŸก pfp
Trebor๐ŸŽฉ๐ŸŸก
@trebor69
How do we do all this? While we launch the token or afterwards? Can we do it for old clankers as well?
1 reply
0 recast
9 reactions

GIGAMฮžSH pfp
GIGAMฮžSH
@gigamesh
Very cool, congrats! No sniper protection added, correct?
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

colfax pfp
colfax
@clfx.eth
any info on how to launch with mr. clank with an alt pairing?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

einik pfp
einik
@einik
@clanker ok, so I can choose pairings, not only eth?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

conca ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ’ป pfp
conca ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ’ป
@0xconca.eth
@dish is the โ€˜3-way splitโ€™ be editable *after* token creation or only *at* token creation?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

๐Ÿ“ฟ zach harris ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿผ pfp
๐Ÿ“ฟ zach harris ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿผ
@zachharris.eth
New CA? Or existing one?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

nftkid.base.eth pfp
nftkid.base.eth
@nftkid
BULLISH ๐Ÿคก๐Ÿ˜ˆ๐Ÿค–
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Icetoad ๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿ• ๐ŸŽถ ๐Ÿˆ ๐Ÿ’š pfp
Icetoad ๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿ• ๐ŸŽถ ๐Ÿˆ ๐Ÿ’š
@icetoad.eth
Great job team! Crazy what you have accomplished in what, 45 days?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Mistershot๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Mistershot๐ŸŽฉ
@mistershot
Burnable!! ๐Ÿ‘€๐Ÿ‘€
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Tokenized Human pfp
Tokenized Human
@tokenizedhuman
fee split is a fantastic feature.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Streamm.tv: Video+Stream On ๐ŸŸฃ pfp
Streamm.tv: Video+Stream On ๐ŸŸฃ
@streamm
nicela!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Refan  pfp
Refan
@refan
dev say burnable tokengod : Woof woof
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Quantum Communications pfp
Quantum Communications
@quantum-co
Say I have a channel and I want to send the token to all channel members. Would this be possible with the allowlist address option now? Thanks for all the hard work you and clanker team are doing!!!!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Holmes pfp
Holmes
@holmes
How is the configurable fee splits (3-ways) functionality implemented?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

jasonmeinzer.eth ๐ŸŽฉโ†‘ pfp
jasonmeinzer.eth ๐ŸŽฉโ†‘
@jasonmeinzer
Bravo - been waiting years to see these innovations! So I can set a third-party split recipient for a portion of my 0.4% LP fee share at launch. But post launch, I relinquish control over that portion, as only that current third-party recipient (or Clanker as contract owner) can reassign the split via the replaceUserRewardRecipient function. My concern: Iโ€™ve been working on an experiment that requires the third-party split share to remain โ€œlockedโ€ or soulbound to the originally designated address, to thwart abuse or transfer to another party. So does the ERC-721 LP token always remain housed in the contract (using โ€œmappingโ€ type distros), regardless of changes to third-party recipients? If yes, could I use an 0xSplits address I control as the recipient, allowing me to retain distribution control by forwarding 100% of the ERC-20 fees to the intended third-party recipient? If ERC-721โ€™s transfer out of the contract on recipient changes, this wonโ€™t work since 0xSplits canโ€™t hold ERC-721โ€™s.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Driogold pfp
Driogold
@driogold
Is there any guide to deploying tokens under the new contract?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

jasonmeinzer.eth ๐ŸŽฉโ†‘ pfp
jasonmeinzer.eth ๐ŸŽฉโ†‘
@jasonmeinzer
250 $DEGEN
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction