Artist from the future.

NFTs since 1998.

Bitcoin since 1985.

Your second favorite artist's second favorite artist.

https://tomato.eth.co

Good take.

You're right, I do care about more than one issue. The one thing I wish to preserve is classical liberalism - the one thing i wish to defeat is authoritarianism - crypto is a recent addition to the cannon of liberalism, and I unabashedly support it under the thesis - "if they adopt crypto protocols they adopt crypto values"

So, an authoritarian that propagates crypto is better than an equal authoritarian that doesn't.

However, I'd far prefer a candidate demonstrably less authoritarian overall, even if that candidate has a blind spot on crypto and hates it.

Here's the challenge.

I have no freaking idea which party/group is less authoritarian. My sources are polluted, I cannot be an expert in all domains. The domain I do have expertise in is crypto AND in crypto, many republican candidates have a more liberal approach than their democrat competitors.

So what do?

I state the candidates positions on crypto as clearly as possible on both sides and push them to be more pro-crypto.

That's my lane.

My lane is pro-crypto, anti-authoritarian.

I am not a single issue voter, though I understand people that are.

I support pro-crypto policy from both political parties, and give voice so voters can hear transparently where politicians land. 

I avoid dishing strong opinion on areas I have limited expertise.

My deep wish for America is that it avoids the 21st century trap of creeping authoritarianism. My contribution to this task is propagating crypto, and in so doing, restore some power to the people.

I think that is a reasonable lane... a wide lane, and things do get complicated when we start talking specifics.

But we do need to rebuild the muscles of having good, intellectually honest conversations while continually reflecting on (and perhaps updating from time to time) our first principles.