df on Warpcast

df pfp

there are 25 clankers with a market cap of > $100K out of 13,000 is that distribution really worth 60% of lifetime fees taken from the creator?

12 replies

15 recasts

48 reactions

nir.eth 🌿🟣🐦☁️ pfp

nir.eth 🌿🟣🐦☁️

imo compared to pump and most 60/40 split is elite. zora charges fees on free mints

1 reply

0 recast

7 reactions

Ramsey 🎩🤝 pfp

Ramsey 🎩🤝

The creator can also put in the LP, if they believe in the token. Then they get 100% of the 1% fee. I mean, the 60% is "taken" only from the 1% Uni fees on the initial LP that is put by clanker, right?

2 replies

0 recast

0 reaction

MM pfp

would be interesting to know of 13000 launches, how many times did the creator put any legitimate effort into marketing the token. how many dex screener banner purchases, telegram groups, follow up casts, etc how many larrys are over 100k MC? and out of how many? genuine question

2 replies

0 recast

1 reaction

Nacho pfp

@nachovarga69.eth

Yes creator cut should be more since they’re the one marketing and pushing it

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Tayyab - d/acc pfp

Should probably have a decaying fee. With ease of launch, most of the “work” of the token increasing in value is done by the late community. It’s good to question this.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Cooki pfp

all the tokens are vapor, they're all going to zero eventually it's a zero-sum money game, actually negative-sum given the fees you mention i don't see a problem with this as long as participants realise what they're doing

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

frend pfp

In my opinion getting some money for a meme is better than getting no money

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Tylerperrystein ❖ pfp

Tylerperrystein ❖

@tylerperrystein

@clanker launch Salty Larry with the ticker $salty and the following image

1 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

Stam🎩🔵🐹 pfp

Stam🎩🔵🐹

@stamrecords.eth

Technically @clanker is the real creator, we’re just asking it to create the clanker for us. It is similar to pumpfun in the way that you’re supposed to buy your own token at launch and then sell some down the line for marketing and to help the market. Currently you can’t buy during mint but they are working on that. It costs nothing to create the clanker so it’s hard to see them not take something. “Convenience tax”

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Nico Cap pfp

Well if they are not reaching $100k then why bother about the fee

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Awkward Seal pfp

Seems excessive to me too

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Turii pfp

With Clank I dont miss the fun, with Larry I do :(

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Oppai pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Uzzam pfp

from a marketing perspective, I believe that 60% is definitely effective. Both creators and clanker share a win-win ecosystem. However, if 60% is considered too excessive, market participants simply won’t choose clanker, and naturally, clanker will lower its fees. It’s straightforward—just think of it as the principle of supply and demand.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Emre Ekinci pfp

The harsch reality is that no one in crypto gives a fuck about how much fees something takes. Why would anyone care about the fee split when they are throwing money into a gambling machine that can 1kx your coin. Wanna vampire attack clanker? Offer incentives. This is solely what drove the open sea fees to zero. Nothing else.

2 replies

0 recast

0 reaction