Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

borodutch pfp
borodutch
@warpcastadmin.eth
gm folks, i wrote an article describing why i never use ssr and you shouldn't either criticism will be ignored but you will comment anyway won't you https://blog.borodutch.com/i-never-use-ssr-and-you-shouldnt-either/
21 replies
5 recasts
75 reactions

df pfp
df
@df
wrong; everything old is new again - only SSR, never CSR, back to where we started: php ๐Ÿ˜‚ The main problem with SSR was the complexity of writing isomorphic code and reasoning about state. With only server side that problem is solved. Turns out sending 300kB bundles of your (code split) JS on first request is slow
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

borodutch pfp
borodutch
@warpcastadmin.eth
ser, ssr initial load is always slower by magnitudes
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

df pfp
df
@df
here's one counterexample to "ssr initial load is always slower by magnitudes" where not only is it not a magnitude slower, but it's faster. https://medium.com/walmartglobaltech/the-benefits-of-server-side-rendering-over-client-side-rendering-5d07ff2cefe8
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

df pfp
df
@df
on each request: send 5kB of HTML or 300kB of JS that needs to parsed, executed before the page is interactive
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

borodutch pfp
borodutch
@warpcastadmin.eth
stop giving me theory i'm talking real world here
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction