The original frames were overvalued. Now v2 frames are drastically undervalued. You can build full apps like you would anywhere else while taking advantage of the massive distribution boost frames provide, including notifications!!!

Neovim enjoyer, "a gift to the culture" | Building at /thirdweb

I think something that's throwing people off a bit is that it can be literally any web app. Almost like the possibilities are too endless, and that causes people to think small and just deploy their web app into a frame without harnessing the social graph. 

Raycast is a great example of how you can build easy to understand UI components with particular features, then build an open source store. The key was it encouraged people to think in the frame of opening raycast, making an action fast and adding shortcuts. IMO we need the same for Frames V2, that mindset clearly communicated. As the SDK matures I think that will eventually happen, but we'll see.

DX Engineer | Head of Developer Relations at /pinata | Building orbiter.host | stevedylan.dev/links

i think progressive enhancement is the best choice here.

start with a web app, gradually introduce FC specific features, then maybe pivot into a separate app