Tony D’Addeo  pfp
Tony D’Addeo
@deodad
enjoyed this piece from @w1nt3r one fun angle to explore for the new frames direction we are exploring: how could we make building dapps easier? some ideas: - no need for a domain name if primary discover / access mechanism is via Farcaster - IPFS is suitable for hosting if Farcaster clients are will to pull from IPFS and serve to users from their CDNs - dapps could assume an Ethereum JSON-RPC Provider will be available if Farcaster clients provide this to frame apps not a panacea but might be some interesting opportunities to make a difference https://w1nt3r.mirror.xyz/csZhMabCHXYiUhnQHrje_6da1n0XZGQ7y2QoETkDyPE
2 replies
3 recasts
30 reactions

W1NTΞR pfp
W1NTΞR
@w1nt3r
IPFS is not very suitable for quick iteration, every time you change something or fix a bug, you get a new "URL". Would be fun to use ENS for this (fse.farcasterapp.eth's record points to latest IPFS hash), but seems clunky and one extra tech to worry about.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

vrypan |--o--| pfp
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
You should look closer to what we do with furl.pro. Example: fc1.furl.pro (hosted on IPFS). Unfortunately, the frame will show a broken image, because I generate a new screenshot every hour but the frame is cached and points to the one generated 2 weeks ago.
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions