Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tony D’Addeo  pfp
Tony D’Addeo
@deodad
Looking for feedback on custom cast actions: - devs can let users add custom action buttons casts - when users press custom action button signed message is posted to the devs server reply here or comment on the doc https://warpcast.notion.site/Custom-Cast-Actions-df137f70d7d847578d4cd458703a8291?pvs=4
25 replies
8 recasts
30 reactions

Tony D’Addeo  pfp
Tony D’Addeo
@deodad
some popular ideas so far: - apps host a manifest file with all the supported actions so they're easily discoverable - context aware actions based on the channel, caster, cast content - actions that trigger additional interaction (i.e. open transaction, collect input)—what about returning an frame?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jacob pfp
Jacob
@jrf
this is very cool :-) (btw, my wallet finally connected!)
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

dylan pfp
dylan
@dylsteck.eth
^ will read further into this but from a high level, this would be sick!! could even see a marketplace where you control the frames and/or cast actions that are allowed per provider
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

David Furlong pfp
David Furlong
@df
These should probably an extension on frames, and actions should be able to open frames. Would also consider how this abstraction could make sense in the cast composer interface to leverage actions there. Here's how we did cast actions in Mod https://github.com/mod-protocol/mod/pull/151
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

jtgi pfp
jtgi
@jtgi
big fan of this, here's some actions I would support: automod - downvote/mute/undo - flag for review - exclude user from moderation others ideas /lp: tomato (aka downvote) /degen: tip paybot: pay 0.001, 0.01, 0.1 bountycaster: create bounty zora/manifoldxyz: create drop (if media attachment)
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

jd 🌺 pfp
jd 🌺
@jdlewin.eth
I’m a dad who’s into water sports, cooking, and poetry. what’s my use case
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

nyc-crypto-cabal-kid pfp
nyc-crypto-cabal-kid
@zinger
Would definitely prefer cast action metadata to live on external domains (similar to frames, I understand refetching is a concern) rather than using warpcast.​com + query params since it will allow other clients to integrate actions more easily
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

christopher pfp
christopher
@christopher
love this! maybe Farcaster clients could send an HTTPS GET to an /actions route with `application/schema+json` header, describing all available actions for a given server provided by the server's action JSON object. the server would send back a signed message validating the actions in the JSON document.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

jd 🌺 pfp
jd 🌺
@jdlewin.eth
just realized this is a huge unlock for what I want to build batea_keanu_whoa.gif
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

jtgi pfp
jtgi
@jtgi
feedback on the doc (can't comment) > registering actions I like the simplicity of a service registering a url with warpcast. Like the chatgpt plugin registry: url returns a manifest with a list of actions it supports, description etc. Would allow other clients to easily integrate as well. cont'd.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

welter pfp
welter
@fun
i. love. this. will users be able to browse and install custom actions? or is it a few pre-determined actions by warpcast?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩 pfp
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
- can you add new input for the signed action? - is this like 'installed frame' or something completely new?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Steve pfp
Steve
@stevedylandev.eth
👀👀
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jayme Hoffman pfp
Jayme Hoffman
@jayme
this is cool! how do you envision users installing and managing cast actions on warpcast or other clients? once installed i imagine: user selects our custom action > bot replies to cast with frame for more options or confirmation
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Yup ☁️🌿🟣🐦🧵 pfp
Yup ☁️🌿🟣🐦🧵
@yup
this is sick. already thinking of what we could build here
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Barbs pfp
Barbs
@bbq
the possibilities for channel specific, role specific and toggle-able actions is getting me hyped
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

𒂠_𒍣𒅀_𒊑 pfp
𒂠_𒍣𒅀_𒊑
@m-j-r
I could not be more stoked. this cuts down on the need to send casts when this could have just been an action. hypothetically, what's the max per cast? supposing the action is multisend. (and what does that imply for gated frames?)
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Colin pfp
Colin
@colin
Subscribe on Paragraph would be awesome Or even “view newsletter”, eg an onramp into a users long form content
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

artlu is on lunchbreak pfp
artlu is on lunchbreak
@artlu
pls pls pls shoehorn in a way to make it play a fart sound
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction