Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
People who would not be interested in living in this: What would be a sufficiently moderate version of the concept that you *would* be willing to live in it?
93 replies
37 recasts
367 reactions
Bryan Johnson
@bryanjohnson
btw, the Daily Mail made up the bit on pizza and donuts to sensationalize the headline. I never said anything of the sort. The Donāt Die Network State will meet people where theyāre at and journey together.
16 replies
5 recasts
85 reactions
Sean Brennan
@seanwbren
Have you proposed how to track when people are following the new social norms? An AI attestor could take in various data points (onchain txs, photos, web2 api calls, etc) and attest to some fact. For network cities that could be user-shared positive actions(š) or police-your-neighbor negative actions (slashed ā)
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
denys
@denys
Bro you may be interested in moving to China basically š«”
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Sean Brennan
@seanwbren
if you have a run club and one member never shows up to run, are they really part of the club. the point is that, just like NFTs can gate access to a warpcast group chat, your IRL actions can gate access to things. Right now, that is a state/corporate-run process
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sean Brennan
@seanwbren
what's the point of making network cities with a new ideal when you have free-riders that do not enact that ideal. @vitalik.eth asked in the OP, what would be the smallest social norm change that you would join a group or club about? where everyone in it is "like-minded". Would you want assurances they actually are?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
