Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
One meta belief I have, is that I think "on the face pursuing idealistic objective A, but actually being tilted toward selfish objective B" is better than "openly pursuing objective B". Many seem to believe the opposite, typically saying something like "at least the latter is honest". I feel like what this misses, is that maintaining the face of pursuing idealistic objective A, and using A to coordinate a large coalition, is a pretty big speed bump against attempts to pursue B too brazenly. When "the mask comes off", things actually become much worse, and strategies that pursue B at high costs to other values (including A, and also often general human decency) become unlocked. Are there any good arguments against this intuition I have? (Whether generalized, or about specific situations)
49 replies
142 recasts
746 reactions

DV pfp
DV
@degenveteran.eth
Sir, I've seen both sides in the military For example in basic training the drill Sergeant is the meanest person ever But behind the scenes (later in my career I worked with them) they are the nicest people. You see the switch flip as soon as they walk outside to the troops. I've ALSO seen the opposite in politics etc as I worked at the presidential level (yes I have pics to prove it) I'd be open to discussing verbally as too much could get misinterpreted via text. DM anytime sir.
1 reply
0 recast
20 reactions

Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Is that the same thing? I feel like that's the "nice vs good" distinction, and there's definitely an interesting debate there, but it's a different debate
2 replies
0 recast
11 reactions