Farcaster

why don’t people form small groups (3-5) around an interest, create a channel, and cast/reply to each other? 

it could:
1. amplify reach (shared audiences)  
2. create richer, more dynamic discussions (shared effort)
3. build deeper connections  

maybe it feels like extra work or it’s hard to find each other?

been thinking about channels ever since @ted posted this

how does farcaster reward people for going deeper on a subject? how does it incentivize @matthewb to share about drinking chocolates or @keccers.eth to go deep on her health stack?

basically…i want to replace my reddit searches with farcaster searches

/ted | exploring the onchain frontier | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina

The Farcaster formerly known as Kchamp. Books, beats, bodybuilding, bright ideas and beautiful things.

katherinechampagne.com

building /juicebox | product marketing & growth | prev. NounsDAO, RAW DAO | learning to code

We need to build up to that.

I'll gladly share stories over time but I'm not publishing an autobiography at the beginning of my time here. 

You have a valid point though. How do we get people to open up. 

IMO There's also the perceived desire. The audience often directs the conversation in the early phases. 

It may help to gather up like minded interests and create sub communities for them and create the conversation starters

Self starters are rare... They need to find those people, the people with so much passion that would do it for free...

Find the leaders and empower them to be leaders of the communities. The hard part though... Is finding the leaders...

I know @ July discussed possibly conducting university level classes amongst others. 

What are some topics of interest you can think of? I'd be willing to teach train and mentor if the desire align.