Farcaster

Clanker Scores are now Live 

helps boost discovery and recommendation of high quality @clanker based on social context

how?
Clanker scores help discover quality clankers based on the social reputation of buyers/traders/holders. with openrank, you can leverage the reputation of farcaster users to create a reputation score for an onchain asset. Anyone can create their own clanker score using openrank, allowing for a free-market of asset scoring.

available via an API now, onchain if there's demand. (DM to get access)

what types of Clanker scores are available?
- based on reputation of buyers, weighted by amount $ bought (live)
- based on reputation of holders, but this can be sybil-ed (live)
- based on recent/new clankers bought by reputable users (soon)
- based on reputation of deployer (soon)

this is just v1 for scores, will be fine tuned as we get more feedback from the community

👀 @proxystudio.eth @dish @nt @haole @div
h/t @osuji.eth @ilemi

v2 clanker scores coming soon
showing recent hot clankers based on buyer, holder, creator reputation.

cc @proxystudio.eth @dish @deployer @nt @tomu @mikedemarais.eth

researching onchain | writing tomu.xyz founded overgie.com mintgate.io | nf.td/tomu

let's build clank.fun. prev: web3 founder, improbable, github, amazon. ntik.me

Currently deploying. Unofficial head platypus of /lp 

Also Clanker, Interface, Banyan or any other app built on base, who tout the number of followers of an account that has bought a token should also give the score of how the tokens have fared. 

Credibility matters. It's a UX differentiator that Twitter doesn't offer.

Ignore my banter, I live in utopia.

That's good. But how do you define buyer reputation? That's what's been bugging me and burning me. Can't say dyor because I'm trusting the reputation that's been routed in most cases.

onchain reputation at karma3labs and @openrank

That's good. But how do you define buyer reputation? That's what's been bugging me and burning me. Can't say dyor because I'm trusting the reputation that's been routed in most cases. https://warpcast.com/4949/0x0d24575f

Free your mind. Trust your instincts. Just do it. Unhinged. User advocate

buyer reputation uses openrank scores of farcaster users who bought the token, weighted by how much they bought.

the intuition here is that a token will be relevant/valuable for you if people you find trustworthy buy that token.

Basically weeds out the wallets commonly linked to those you would be "less likely" to buy considering their past activities.

Does this ALSO attribute so wallets the wallets are connected to? The branching or whatever the tech term is?

Combat and Degen Veteran - 
Host: /dv /socks Mod: /parksrec
ICEBREAKER: https://app.icebreaker.xyz/profiles/bJLRVoekOGpE10heahpwW?key=

I like this but I kind of don't "can it also be based on the number of calls the user has made" 

A- I like it because people pay for "good information" which people build that reputation.

B- I don't because almost all end up in the gutter eventually. That shouldn't reflect bad on them, however you combat it with from call to let's say first 24 hours or whatever.

It's definitely fun to watch adaptations happen live...

I don't know the numbers but @askgina.eth can you determine the total number of base ETH Tokens deployed compared to Total with a market cap of 1 million or higher?

And let's not go down the road of how much they made for their followers (I get the thought behind it)

But I can't control when you sell...

How... I'd just look at "potential" within first 24 hours and go from there... See what data set pulls up

*Rephrasing. 

I doubt less likely is what openrank suggests. Right? My question, can it also be based on the number of calls the user has made. Can it factor not only his followers count but also the amount of money he's made or lost for his followers. I've seen a lot of tokens called and buried. So wondering if there's a solution