Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/social
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩 pfp
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
It seems no one has actually cracked the "incentivising quality content" puzzle yet. Once sloppy incentive is applied, content become shit drawing tons of spammers and farmers .. https://paragraph.xyz/@untitled/untitled-own-the-day What can we learn from reddit, stackoverflow, hackernews or even youtube?
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions

JR ↑ pfp
JR ↑
@juli
Direct Reward for engagement is never a quality incentive I think - especially when it’s a public convo on a mass app, and not a handpicked group of thoughtful readers, chatters. IMHO w/ another level of abstracted content we get better data 1️⃣ create good content 2️⃣ vote/rank content 3️⃣ consume & track (w/out name) 4️⃣ reward content & curators (use voting for discovery but subjective/blackbox/data-based assessment of consumption from unbiased users instead of #likes from influencers) 200 $degen
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩 pfp
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
/degencast is a lot about vote/rank content. Launching soon!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction