phil pfp
phil
@phil
I love to see the continued adoption of L2s, especially open-source ecosystems like the OP stack However, until we solve the UX of bridging we’re not going to see the significant adoption needed to drive the next wave I refuse to hold 42 different types of ETH and the cognitive overhead that comes with it
10 replies
8 recasts
42 reactions

✳️ dcposch on daimo pfp
✳️ dcposch on daimo
@dcposch.eth
I'm not convinced that the future is tons of L2s with bridges. Why shouldn't L2 have a winner dynamic the way L1 has? Once you have one that's fast, secure, and permissionless, & some critical mass of adoption, why use another? You'll still have competition among sequencers, bundlers, searchers, etc just like L1
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Sheldon Trotman pfp
Sheldon Trotman
@sheldon
I disagree. I think there will be many many more L2s. The difference between L1s and L2s is that L1s have a notion of “economic security” so their economic mass attracts more mass while the L2s are about execution environments and the details of the applications impacts what’s the best execution environment.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction