Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
✳️ dcposch on daimo
@dcposch.eth
The time's ripe for someone to fork Wikipedia. Imagine: clean executive summary for every article; omnibar search that answers your questions; Community Notes mechanic for ground truth on contentious issues. https://twitter.com/realchrisrufo/status/1780929268949614848 '''''''''''
9 replies
5 recasts
42 reactions
✳️ dcposch on daimo
@dcposch.eth
The entire edit history (incl pre-censorship) is open source & can be reused to bootstrap something better! LLMs exist now! No network effect--even if all your friends are still using Wikipedia, you can switch to a better successor by yourself. It is *by far* the most disrupt-able of the top 10 websites:
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Thumbs Up
@thumbsup.eth
You can have all of that via wikiwand https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Main_Page
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
nixo
@nixo
my friend, you're bringing lib vs repub twitter engagement bait about someone who doesn't even work at the wikimedia foundation anymore onto farcaster
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
raquo
@raquo.eth
is this a rufo-agreement cast? yikes
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
callum
@csmit
You might be looking for conservapedia
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Adam
@adam-
Just to comment on Katherine Maher's statement. Anyone who uses ambiguous terms like "free and open" have to come to terms with how that means different things to different people. As soon as those loose terms are applied in a way that differs from your definition, it doesn't make them not true
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
taofeek.eth
@taofeek
You're advocating that because you refuse to accept that other view points exist apart from that you're used to?
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Streamm.tv: Video+Stream On 🟣
@streamm
+ @farcaster as the socialproof layer
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
cryptocellaris.eth 🎩
@cryptocellaris
A web3 Wikipedia fork that paid people for editing could be wild. Wikipedia has in a bit of a death spiral over lack of editors for years.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
