Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Thomas pfp
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
Some people here and on X have expressed outrage at parts of the opening ceremony of the Olympics in France. As someone who is both natively French and a "global citizen" (lived on four continents, visited 50 countries, expat for nearly 20 years), I wanted to share my dual perspective. My goal is not to pass judgment on Friday's performance, but rather set the cultural context in which it was delivered. So, don't shoot the messenger. Also, references are annotated in brackets like this: [i] for further reading at the end. The TL;DR is that the French brand of secularism (laïcité) is unique, highly idiosyncratic, and part of the core identity of the French republic; it's understandable that it does not translate well to an international audience. Now, onto the 🧵: 1/9
52 replies
66 recasts
413 reactions

Thomas pfp
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
> That show was blasphemy! The concept of blasphemy (the action of speaking sacrilegiously about a god or the sacred) may speak to you, but it explicitly does not exist in secular France [i]. In France, religions are treated as mere ideas, and like all ideas, they can be examined, praised, criticized, and even mocked. In the eyes of the secular French republic, no text or religious icon deserves special protection, no matter how holy to some. That aspect of freedom of speech is as foundational to the French as the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution is to Americans. Of course, people whose identity is rooted in faith might take offense at that, which leads me to... 2/9
6 replies
2 recasts
101 reactions

Thomas pfp
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
> Why pick on religion though? I can't speak for the artistic director (Thomas Jolly)'s decision to add religion to the show. But one clue is that France has had a long adversarial history with religion. Until the Revolution of 1789, the Catholic church ruled over all of society. The clergy ran civil registries, public schools, higher education, tax collection, and courts. You had better be a good Catholic or you would be subject to arbitrary abuse, including massacres of people of other or no faith. All that changed not just in 1789 but also as recently as 1905, when a law [ii] put a final end to Catholicism being the state religion of France. Common people revolted, fought, and died for the right to criticize religion. Furthermore, the show also picked at another ancient French institution, the royalty, by prominently displaying a beheaded Marie Antoinette. The French maintain a certain pride in having ousted their king and clergy simultaneously, and have kept a deep distrust of both ever since. 4/9
3 replies
1 recast
26 reactions

Thomas pfp
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
> Why pick on Christianity and not Islam? My first reaction to this question was, "Yikes!". The likely answer though is that the French mocking Catholicism (as the historically dominant religion) is akin to the French mocking themselves and their own past, which is considered acceptable. It would be extremely weird to a French audience if a public show like the Olympics opening randomly mocked a foreign religion, whether Islam, Judaism, Hinduism, etc. without any historical basis for doing so. Remember that Islam is much more recent to France than Christianity (8th century notwithstanding [iii]), and remains a minority religion in the country. Furthermore, French artists have in fact taken to criticizing other religions, incl. Islam, in the past few years and in less notable settings, and some have paid a heavy price ([iv]). Laws have also been updated to extend secular rules to Islam ([v]). So, it's not like other religions get a free pass under the French republic. 5/9
3 replies
0 recast
29 reactions

Thomas pfp
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
> The show was lewd / a grotesque display of trans people / etc. That part of the show was burlesque, a genre intended "to caricature the manner or spirit of serious works, or by ludicrous treatment of their subjects" [vi] (in this case, the Last Supper). It's definitely not mainstream considering its extravagant display of, well, non-normative sensuality. The ceremony's director exercised his artistic license in full by subverting classical expectations here. But (AFAIK) it wasn't a "woke display" with an agenda to promote DEI; the burlesque genre long predates the 21st century histrionics over gender identity that are so acute in the US but much less so in France. 6/9
2 replies
0 recast
27 reactions

Thomas pfp
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
> That blue Smurf dude at the Last Supper was a disgrace. The blue character (played by French comedian Philippe Katerine) is an interpretation of Nietzsche's Dionysus, used here as an antagonist to "the Crucified" (Jesus). It's not as randomly degenerate as it seems; it is a burlesque and highly symbolic representation of a pretty deep theme with historical and philosophical undertones. Here's a great Reddit explanation that I found from years ago that explains that context very well. 7/9
4 replies
0 recast
32 reactions

Ivan P pfp
Ivan P
@dayofniagra
Hail the Dionysian spirit!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction