Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Claus Wilke
@clauswilke
Why is it that storage is twice as expensive for reactions than for casts? Surely people react more than they cast? And also in terms of data used, storing a like should require less storage than storing the entire content of a cast, right?
3 replies
2 recasts
3 reactions
Danica Swanson
@danicaswanson
This is the explanation I've seen. I know there have been previous discussions about how these limits affect behavior, so perhaps others will chime in. https://warpcast.com/v/0x06407001
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Claus Wilke
@clauswilke
Maybe, but if you do the math it just doesn't add up for me. There's no way 2500 reactions require more than 1MB of storage. So 1GB of storage (~500 images or 1h of video) requires the equivalent of 1000 storage units, or $7000 / year.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
