Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Finlay 🦊 pfp
Dan Finlay 🦊
@danfinlay
People throwing around "proof of personhood" like it's a problem that has already been solved, or is trivially solved. I can't shake the feeling we've done our people wrong by letting this stuff slide. Is it too late to adopt a culture of being specific about the solutions we're referring to?
5 replies
2 recasts
93 reactions

Dan Finlay 🦊 pfp
Dan Finlay 🦊
@danfinlay
https://warpcast.com/danfinlay/0x3a0a5b03
1 reply
0 recast
25 reactions

Jack pfp
Jack
@jackten
Does worldcoin not solve it?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

polymutex pfp
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
I am guilty of this. The reason for imprecision is that I don't know what will work in practice. See Vitalik's take that multiple PoP solutions can complement each other. Gitcoin Passport's approach follows this: Let users decide how to prove their personhood. https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2023/07/24/biometric.html
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Monteluna pfp
Monteluna
@monteluna
Our industry does have a semantics problem. Another one that is wildly thrown around is around chain abstraction. Solutions that are live generally work on different parts of the stack and are fundamentally solving one aspect of the issues.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

zombified pfp
zombified
@zombified
Ppl be like "Solve world hunger"
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction