Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
curtiscoffee
@curtiscoffee.eth
Please check out the most recent Vrbish newsletter, highlighting key observations from the intense debate around Proposal #26. It's important we continue the dialogue here in order to improve the DAO's processes.
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Afo
@afo.eth
Thanks for taking the time to write this, I feel a lot is off base and not factual which is why I asked to share my perspective. This post paints inaccurate picture of the proposal and doesn't even dive into the proposal and the value of it. This also doesn't acknowledge that majority of people supported the proposal regardless of 2 votes from me and it only failed because 1 person with a ton votes was against it which should also be seen as issue based on the other issues being highlighted. I'm learning more about the Vrbs community and wonder if there's a true focus on scaling impact or just virtue signaling. Reading this line really rubbed me the wrong way, "I have reached out to the proposal creator to open a dialogue and will be happy to issue a correction to my above conclusion if more facts come to light." You didn't reach out, I did and your approach was to make the post 1st then revise which I feel is unfair cause I literally donated Vrbs for a Greenpill Dev Guild raffle.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Cool Beans 🌞
@coolbeans1r.eth
I may have been a little too unVRBiSh with my language and attitude in the private chat. My apologies for that. My tolerance for shenanigans is low, and my ADHD gets the better of me sometimes 😜 no excuses though, I need to be nicer. I think we can get it all straightened out, it's all a big experiment in the end about how to fund with minimal human intervention. We should schedule a biweekly or monthly VRBS call anyway to make sure we all feel good about how things are going. (I'll see about scheduling it)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
