arbitrum

1/ The most admirable part of /arbitrum’s history is that Princeton wanted Ed to patent interactive fraud proofs, but Ed convinced the university that patents are not aligned with the openness of crypto and abandoned it

1/ The most admirable part of /arbitrum’s history is that Princeton wanted Ed to patent interactive fraud proofs, but Ed convinced the university that patents are not aligned with the openness of crypto and abandoned it
https://x.com/edfelten/status/1772590896350892480?s=46&t=WH1NEB3O4jfMt861gchHvA

Ecosystem /base. Consumer /socialgraphvc. Writing dtso.org paragraph.xyz/@cryptso. Hosting /consumercrypto /consumer-apps /consumer /infra /azuki.

3/ This is what makes the crypto space so special: we build on top of each other’s ideas and we are collaborative because the goal has always been and always will be to scale Ethereum… together

4/ More on interactive fraud proofs: https://medium.com/offchainlabs/interactive-fraud-proofs-arbitrums-secret-sauce-debc3b019418

2/ Fast forward to today, all optimistic rollup teams have come to the consensus that interactive proving is the best way to scale vs. re-executing transactions, as it allows you to be more efficient and flexible

Now Ed just needs to embrace the openness of crypto even further and start posting on farcaster 😤