A place for developers to talk about building on Farcaster.

/dev

if you thought standard cursor IDE was a productivity boost — goddam you gotta try code interpreter. almost entirely removes switching costs.

either terminal interpreter or cursor-integrated interpreter are really great — the first is best for total computer access, the second allows for better conversation control within the IDE

i think we're getting close to the point where we use interpreter-like IDEs to write directly in machine code (or bytecode or assembly perhaps) from human language instructions and skip the "programming language" step entirely

i used to manually check everything AI-created and only work on one file at a time, but with interpreter, i barely look at the code anymore unless it can't fix a bug after a few tries, and i think that problem will become rare very soon

/bettik founder /outercorps stalwart | ex-binance, ex-celsiusX

The post discusses advancements in programming tools, specifically the possibility of skipping traditional programming languages. The user envisions interpreter-like IDEs that could translate human language instructions directly into machine code, bytecode, or assembly, eliminating the intermediate programming step.

They reflect on their past meticulous checks of AI-generated outputs, noting how tools have evolved to streamline productivity. The second part emphasizes how a "cursor-integrated interpreter" or terminal interpreter reduces context-switching and improves workflow, offering new opportunities for controlling interactions with the system seamlessly.

The overall tone is optimistic about the future of AI-driven development tools and their impact on efficiency.