cqb pfp

cqb

@cqb

257 Following
1007 Followers
cqb pfp
cqb
@cqb
Notice the implication that he wants to put judges in Alcatraz if they defy him
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
cqb pfp
cqb
@cqb
Can add Saskatchewan in here too
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
cqb pfp
cqb
@cqb
Always go through the ToC to see if the book title lied to me
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
cqb pfp
cqb
@cqb
A bit of a hidden gem math explainer about how tensors are useful for calculating derivatives! https://youtu.be/DqYA3nlWPKg
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
cqb pfp
cqb
@cqb
Play* the game. But I guess you do pay the game with your time and in exchange you get fun :p
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
cqb pfp
cqb
@cqb
Are people not into EOF now?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
cqb pfp
cqb
@cqb
I've been brewing an idea for a little while to make an old school game boy style game that is zk provable with the ability to submit a proof onchain to claim collectables. No weird betting/markets, just use the game to collect a kind of trading card or whatever, no obligation to participate onchain either, you could just pay the game if you want
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
cqb pfp
cqb
@cqb
In the early days of the campaign I would get so many whenever I watched youtube on my tv
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
cqb pfp
cqb
@cqb
Missed opportunity for carnage
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
cqb pfp
cqb
@cqb
This is exactly what I have in mind whenever I comment it haha
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
cqb pfp
cqb
@cqb
Que no los dos
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
cqb pfp
cqb
@cqb
How do you feel about the alignment/AI safety/control scene? Is there anything you find interesting there?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
cqb pfp
cqb
@cqb
What are your study habits for learning new math that help you really get a grasp on a new concept?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
cqb pfp
cqb
@cqb
What's a mathematic (or physics) concept that you've studied that had an unexpected application to crypto? (Bonus question: the same but applied to AI?)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
cqb pfp
cqb
@cqb
Thank you!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
cqb pfp
cqb
@cqb
Yeah, I don't mean negate the proof, but negate the *statement* that is being proved, and then do a proof for the negated statement. But I see your point about infinite such statements. I'd imagine you could find some useful ones in there maybe (but at this point I'm taking it off my ass, haha)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
cqb pfp
cqb
@cqb
I'm wondering if this reinforces a popperian model of knowledge, where we can only disqualify hypotheses to get a more accurate model of the world. Another question that comes up: if we don't know if we can prove a true statement why not just negate it and try to prove the negative case instead?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
cqb pfp
cqb
@cqb
I need to dig into the incompleteness theorem more, but does it state that a thing that is false can in principle never be proven mathematically? Or does it only apply to possibly true things?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
cqb pfp
cqb
@cqb
What has you hopeful about synchronous composability within 2 years? I'm optimistic that we'll get there, but not super confident in that timeframe
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Smarter Every Day pfp
Smarter Every Day
@smartereveryday
He is risen!
63 replies
34 recasts
395 reactions