Formerly @preach.































































Building @LEAK — Your new age jukebox. 















WIP: https://leaked.app 

/ted | exploring the onchain frontier | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina

The on-boarding strategy is “DM Dan if you want to get in”

That is still an extremely poor on boarding strategy. I’m not talking about engineering, I’m talking about the business aka the ability to generate revenue from this. Farcaster is going to need users, not featuritis, to achieve this.

users now have invites to distribute, not just dan.

it’s challenging to build in public, but the team has shared their strategic roadmap. it doesn’t sound like you’ve read it or participated in the regular calls?

regardless, agree to disagree: imo the team here is one of the most business-oriented in crypto.

CTO @ Morphic. Previously @ Polygon, @ Uber. Working on disrupting Hollywood with GenAI

https://nf.td/abv

I’m sure a company that’s raised $30M can do a better more efficient job of on-boarding while still maintaining quality.

Well, I think if this is your entire argument (correct me if it's not, but that seems to be how you are summarizing here) then it's very weak. 

I agree with the overall sentiment that maybe FC needs to fix top of the funnel (common to all of web3 tbh) but limiting onboarding is one of the reason FC is the place it is.