Content pfp
Content
@
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Colin pfp
Colin
@colin
Do you take VC meetings even if you aren't fundraising? Pros: - establish relationships - possible customers - possible intros to other VCs - product feedback (though quality is debatable) Cons: - time consuming - doesn't get you closer to pmf - VCs can be good at wasting your time
22 replies
2 recasts
9 reactions

Alok Vasudev pfp
Alok Vasudev
@alok
if the VC is asking for the meeting make them earn it!
3 replies
1 recast
6 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Mostly avoid.
0 reply
1 recast
3 reactions

Thibauld pfp
Thibauld
@thibauld
I do not personally, except for very few exceptions. When you're not fundraising, you should be heads down building. And, corollary, when you're fundraising, you should stop building (easier said than done!) and be heads down fundraising and talking to as many VCs as you can in as little time as possible.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Robin A. pfp
Robin A.
@degenroot.eth
Only speak with VCs who you know can help you move the needle (either by recommendation or gut feeling)! Your attention should be on product and growth.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Brian Kim pfp
Brian Kim
@brianjckim
imo: if you're not funded yet, it's not the best use of your time if you're in-between rounds, i think it's a net positive
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

casslin.eth pfp
casslin.eth
@casslineth
Time better spend w/ users, future users, clients, or ur service providers, etc, aka who’s directly relevant to ur biz at the moment
1 reply
1 recast
0 reaction

Tushar Soni pfp
Tushar Soni
@tusharsoni.eth
Depends on how you're getting the meeting (warm intro or cold outreach) and the VC's role at their fund. If I'm not actively raising, I would only take meetings from a warm intro and if it's a partner+ at the fund. Otherwise, it's mostly analysts collecting data
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

casslin.eth pfp
casslin.eth
@casslineth
No
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

RichCL pfp
RichCL
@richcl
As a first timer pre-funding, I resist the urge to make “vc meetings” a vanity metric. I take one or two here and there for accountability and nothing more.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

netop://ウエハ pfp
netop://ウエハ
@netopwibby.eth
The space my product is in has no VCs even interested in it. That being said, I have had *some* meetings and I find them super useful for demystifying assumptions I've had about people caring about DNS and TLDs. These meetings have saved me spending too much time on a pitch deck. I'm now focused on just building.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nicholas pfp
Nicholas
@nintynick.eth
Only when fundraising
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dogan pfp
Dogan
@doganeth
Currently accepting all the intros from VC’s but we just stopped it until product launch (our time is sssooooo limited)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ash pfp
ash
@ashmoney.eth
i avoid taking vc meetings when not fundraising. the cons outweigh the pros.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Alex Palmer pfp
Alex Palmer
@thatalexpalmer.eth
Yes but sparingly, and not for product feedback. Only with funds I’ve wanted to meet/who wanted to meet us that came in through the immediate network.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jonny Mack pfp
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
yep
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

King pfp
King
@king
I will value any feedback they can give me. There should always be a take away from that conversation anyway, tacit knowledge and such.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ricky Tan pfp
Ricky Tan
@ricky.eth
No, been in too many of them which ended up being VCs trying to extract information and/or using it as due diligence for funding a new competitor
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Gajesh pfp
Gajesh
@gaj
depends on the VC. mostly yes. once a VC just came in as a spy of competitor. (when i was a founder)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Warpmaster General pfp
Warpmaster General
@my
My filter on this was replying to any inbounds with "not interested, but I'm happy to talk to a partner." The serious ones respond, the associates usually ghost.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction