Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Cole Perkins pfp
Cole Perkins
@coleperkins
I was initially drawn to Nouns because of its grassroots approach — a group of strangers on the internet coming together to coordinate capital. It felt like Nouns still embodied the magic of what a DAO was originally proposed to be. Over the past four years, we've worked with a number of DAOs, many of which have gradually shifted towards more traditional corporate structures, adopting KYC processes, grants committees, working pods, and increased admin overhead. While I dont view these structures as inherently bad, as they off offer a lot of benefits, and regulatory peace of mind. They do risk losing some aspects of decentralization if not managed carefully.
1 reply
1 recast
9 reactions

Cole Perkins pfp
Cole Perkins
@coleperkins
Personally I’m still uncertain about the best direction for the Nouns DAO I would want to see. One interesting possibility is a true fork, used as it was intended, allowing the creation of two DAOs: 
1. Nouns DAO Classic (DUNA DAO)
2. Nouns DAO 2.0 (A new forked DAO) Although this might be unsustainable given the current treasury size and the risk of people walking away, it would be an interesting experiment. As a small voter, we’ll be closely watching how all of this unfolds. https://warpcast.com/spencerperkins.eth/0x5c28ec4f
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions