Cassie Heart
@cassie
https://twitter.com/chrisblec/status/1632851504175501312
5 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
jesse.base.eth 🔵
@jessepollak
as we shared in our blog, our intention is for base to remain open, decentralized, and permissionless. https://base.mirror.xyz/H_KPwV31M7OJT-THUnU7wYjOF16Sy7aWvaEr5cgHi8I
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Cassie Heart
@cassie
I understand intentions, but for now, it’s not decentralized, which lead to the questions in the interview. What happens when tornado cash gets deployed to Base?
5 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Shane Glynn
@cno
A boring OFAC tells CB to not bridge out any token that touched the contract. A creative OFAC will tell CB to block the sequencer from allowing any transaction involving the contract.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Adam Hodges 🔵-'
@hodges.eth
Blocking the transactions at the sequencer isn't an effective means of censorship on an optimism bedrock chain. Transactions can be pushed (circumventing the sequencer) to Base directly from L1. See https://community.optimism.io/docs/developers/bedrock/explainer/#deposits
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Roman Giler
@romang86
Selective decentralization
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction