Nadav pfp
Nadav
@nadav
Suggestion for @dwr.eth @v — consider refining the interaction on frame content rendering during its “state transitions”. Feels a lil like a modem internet slideshow right now — how can it be either dramatically faster or more fluid feeling. Maybe speed is the main thing to focus on…
4 replies
0 recast
10 reactions

Nadav pfp
Nadav
@nadav
Relatedly, what does the frames paradigm look like if it’s mediated over websockets v POSTs. Could open a much richer design space for frame experiences — particularly if the frame host can push updates to the rendered image / buttons @dwr.eth
3 replies
0 recast
6 reactions

sean pfp
sean
@swabbie.eth
100%. requiring the entire view to be pushed to the viewer fully rendered is a 15+ years loss of ux evolution. the need for dynamic loading is a must for today’s expected user experience
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

christopher pfp
christopher
@christopher
there’s also the element of scalability for developers. opening up a long lived socket connection for every load of a frame as users scroll the feed could be draining to our resources.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

sean pfp
sean
@swabbie.eth
the app could shut down the connection when the user scrolls the frame out of view?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

christopher pfp
christopher
@christopher
it consumes a ton of resources both ways. a lot of bandwidth and CPU cycles burned for each handshake open/close.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

sean pfp
sean
@swabbie.eth
but the user is only engaging one frame at a time
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction