Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/slowcore-hq
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Danica Swanson
@danicaswanson
This lovely comment from @chriscocreated makes me wish for more sustainable ways to fund, organize, + preserve thoughtful curation work done by *humans* (not algos) in the FC ecosystem. Psychologically, the hardest thing about casting for me is that all my casts vanish into the algo-driven "exhaust stream," never to be seen or commented on again. I could compile topic-specific best-of recs such as @cameron's canonical advice-for-newbies article on a website (if I had sufficient funding for that work), but discovery would still be a problem. There's value leak happening here because there's no viable "slowcore" + positive-sum path (AFAIK) to leverage the power of compounding for previous curation work. What if I had a space to curate custom selections of great work in ways that: 1) reduce existing cognitive load for the curator (or at least don't *add* to it), and 2) maximize chances of discovery by interested readers at their leisure? I know there are gigabrains working on this. Just thinking aloud.
4 replies
1 recast
11 reactions
ChrisCoCreated
@chriscocreated
great problem statement 1000 $degen can moxie help solve this @betashop.eth
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
Danica Swanson
@danicaswanson
Ⓜ️oxie seems to be the most promising possibility I've seen so far. I've been thinking about how I might use it for the Slowcore HQ channel in accordance with the vision @tombeck.eth wrote about in his recent (brilliant!) piece. I'll have more to say on this later; I'm still thinking it through. But in the meantime, I'd love input about how Moxie might fit into this, especially from those who've read Tom's piece. https://paragraph.xyz/@driftless/curator-economy?referrer=danicaswanson.eth
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
