Rando pfp

Rando

@chasing-pointers

199 Following
155 Followers
Sujit ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Sujit ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ ๐ŸŽฉ
@0xsujit
To all the ๐Ÿ’ŽโœŠ๏ธ We have survived ๐Ÿ‘‡ - BTC crash from $69k to $16k - LUNA to $0 by Do kwon - 3AC going from $18bln to $0 - Celsius and #voyager bankrupt - FTX and #FTT Meltdown - USDC de-peg - BUSD gone - CZ stepping down And you are still here in crypto seeing $BTC go to $100k WAGMI ! ๐Ÿ’ช
0 reply
2 recasts
8 reactions
Rando pfp
Rando
@chasing-pointers
Labrador energy
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Rando pfp
Rando
@chasing-pointers
Are not all Cali's electoral votes for Trump anyway? Or was the "popular vote compact" only meant for when Dems win? hmmmm...
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rando pfp
Rando
@chasing-pointers
is that witness as "brave and stunning" as the Palo Alto lady who lied about Kavanaugh and claimed her rental unit was a "second front door because of her PTSD"? lol
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Murtaza Hussain pfp
Murtaza Hussain
@mazmhussain
Trauma from some of these:
18 replies
31 recasts
170 reactions
Rando pfp
Rando
@chasing-pointers
Solana
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Polymarket pfp
Polymarket
@polymarket
There's a 31% chance Trump creates a Naitonal Bitcoin Reserve.
5 replies
15 recasts
75 reactions
Rando pfp
Rando
@chasing-pointers
You are undervaluing the intrinsic utility in an ubiquitous, durable store of value as a reserve asset (private and public). Real estate is a different asset class because it provides a different utility far afield from store of value.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rando pfp
Rando
@chasing-pointers
or it's a reference to Austrian Economics principles. There's no free lunch. Debt will be paid, one way or another, eventually.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rando pfp
Rando
@chasing-pointers
Warren is a prime midwit.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Catch0x22 pfp
Catch0x22
@catch0x22.eth
I'm not one to call bullish or bearish in a serious tone but the vibe has exponentionally shifted Risk vs. Reward is being repriced on an institutional level. It no longer matters what people think of crypto The devs are free to dev again. Every fund and trading desk with cracked zoomers is looking for exposure to crypto now that Blackrock has made it socially acceptable
1 reply
1 recast
5 reactions
Rando pfp
Rando
@chasing-pointers
Integrate Dialect.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rando pfp
Rando
@chasing-pointers
anyone building on Dialect? interested in hearing your experience...
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rando pfp
Rando
@chasing-pointers
yes. ORMs are cheap stimulants that you pay for 10x later. Just write your queries.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rando pfp
Rando
@chasing-pointers
LOL. Demuxed: "Women who don't agree with my orthodoxy don't count as women." Forget that many voted R. They don't count. This is why people don't like the rhetoric around these obvious histrionics.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rando pfp
Rando
@chasing-pointers
Because he hired Michael Barr into an opaque, hyper powerful role. Barr is the single largest threat to both BTC and crypto. He has basically sworn to destroy both. He is single-handedly jamming up meaningful stablecoin regs because he doesn't want to "legitimize" them.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Rando pfp
Rando
@chasing-pointers
lol. bye
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rando pfp
Rando
@chasing-pointers
it's already happening in the private sector. What it does, if the Fed gets their head out of their sphincter, is enable an extended period of USD dominance via regulated stable coins that increase dollar demand by a greater amount than is lost to dissipation of seigniorage that BTC reserves cause.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Rando pfp
Rando
@chasing-pointers
OCI Easily the best cloud for fintech and crypto.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rando pfp
Rando
@chasing-pointers
That's one way, or the DAOs can be managed by the states. The basic idea is that liquidity results from validators staking to earn yield processing the votes per the election contracts. The more validators the more UDSC which an actually sane Fed would recognize as a positive for USD. I'm sure there are some legal/constitutional things to consider, but technically and economically this would work. It does presume that legislators want actually fair, transparent and efficient elections. That's a big assumption...else we'd have voter ID already.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction