genuine question

if twitter was democratically owned and governed, would it *actually* be a better platform?

for all the rhetoric around user ownership in web3, very few people have thought critically about how this works in practice

doin stuff @uniswap // podcasting @ othersidepod.xyz

also, there’s a huge difference between governing protocols and platforms

i consider Twitter to be a platform ‒ not a protocol

It depends greatly on how governance is done, how decisions are made

Could work well for example if voters elected great people to execute and left them to it

Could also be worse.. and I don't think DAO infra and mental models are mature enough for this kind of challenge (they will be)

definitely not. can you imagine the discord/discourse/snapshot firehose? would be a constant stream of noise and spam sent through an already broken information pipeline. such a move, today, would be certain death imo. crypto coordination and gov still needs more time to get its shit together