https://anoncast.org | anonymous posting for $ANON holders, powered by zk proofs | CA 0x0Db510e79909666d6dEc7f5e49370838c16D950f @anontokenbase

I'm here to build global community. Artist, collector, father and husband, leftist, LGBTQ. Twitter @ OurCoOpFuture. pfp by xeriesjame. Creator of /solidarity

It actually started as that, under @superanon, with app-level anonymity protection. Then a few steps (AI agent, token, etc. things I was saying that stray us further from the light of God) later, we now have @anoncast with the zk-proven anonymity.

Your new onchain assistant | Gina Knows Best | askgina.ai

I was hoping you'd give more real-world examples instead of limiting yourself to blockchain. Example: Sharing specific medical history data while withholding what you don't want to share.

politics

On January 20, 2025 I will be stepping down as @SECGov Chair.

A thread 🧵⬇️

Gary Gensler

https://x.com/GaryGensler/status/1859658192298574096?t=u7Qd7rljwXX2NdRpIQN7zg&s=19

Fwiw zk-tech is fascinating and this is one of the earliest applications of it. Highly recommend researching it. In fact, @askgina.eth can you draft a few practical applications of zk-tech we may see in near future?

Technically, you can. People can leak, whistleblow stuff with provable anonymity.

It's a bigger account with a lot of built-in followers.

But IMHO that use case is cringe. Feels grifty. To me it's the provable anonymity that is the stronger point.

Farcaster

zk cryptography will make all your wildest dreams about ethereum come true.

https://chainleft.art

Dad, data scientist, blockchain native artist.

Power consolidation=evil.

Look
https://warpcast.com/rsa.eth/0xc2a1f0c3

Crypto Twitter is coming back to Farcaster.

They are so back.

Geopolitics

While it's good to finally have the recognition of genocide in Wikipedia, it is more appropriate to call it "Palestinian Genocide" instead of "Gaza Genocide":

1. The attacks are not limited to Gaza. West Bank has been severely destroyed in the last 1 year too, with thousands killed, injured or forced to migrate

2. 70% of the Gaza population are refugees from other parts of Palestine that got colonized in the last few decades

3. Genocide happens on people, on ethnicities (in this case Palestinian), not on cities

I agree. And while I'm grateful that it's finally on wiki, there's a bit of nuance being lost there

tech culture religion society /worldview /polska /p-doom /aicoin coin: $PDOOM

I agree. And while I'm grateful that it's finally on wiki, there's a bit of nuance being lost there

https://warpcast.com/chainleft/0x87841e95

cryptoleft

Artist from the future.

NFTs since 1998.

Bitcoin since 1985.

Your second favorite artist's second favorite artist.

https://manifold.gallery/tomato

To be clear M. Obama never running is irrelevant, Dems still were speculating her name when Biden dropped out. I just gave her as an example for placeholder.

Again, I agree with you that over time this will disappear. I disagree with you that this isn't problematic. It tells you that these voters aren't thinking for themselves anything else for the future beyond what they were told to vote for recently. It's a cult signal, apoliticism signal, lack of imagination signal - call it what you want, it's a problem.

summary_large_image

Situation in the State of Palestine:
#ICC Pre-Trial Chamber I rejects the State of Israel’s challenges to jurisdiction and issues warrants of arrest for Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant. Learn more ⤵️ https://t.co/opHUjZG8BL

Int'l Criminal Court

🎯 
https://x.com/IntlCrimCourt/status/1859563977455366501

On this one I don't agree with you. I don't really buy into the "placeholder theory". They could've easily said someone else, like Michelle Obama or sth. It's overwhelmingly Harris.

Yep. Still this poll is an indication of a sentiment that really troubles me.

Feel free to re-read the thread, with links and resources.

First: "What Ukrainians want matters"

When Ukrainians prefer peace over territory: "They don't know what they want, Russia would want all territory"

When shown proof of Russia preferring NATO deterrence over territory: "If they don't want NATO, they shouldn't have invaded"

When shown the chronology: "Why can't the world's largest military build bases around another country?"

I hoped you'd contribute to conversation with data or a serious argument but that seems too deep for you. Time to sit down champ.

I'm gonna ignore the constant goalpost-moving in this conversation. But if you don't understand how evil & dangerous NATO is (not just for Russia, but other countries and even its members), then we can't have a serious conversation.

Chainleft

@chainleft