timdaub 🥝/🫦 pfp
timdaub 🥝/🫦
@timdaub.eth
but would this all have happened if the DAO had required a 2/3 majority for dispersing > 10% of funds?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

tldr (tim reilly) pfp
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
Interesting idea
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

timdaub 🥝/🫦 pfp
timdaub 🥝/🫦
@timdaub.eth
What I find noteworthy is that the proposal created a near perfect controversy. Didn‘t it create a near 50:50 situation? This is why there are camps now, or not? If it was a 2/3 quorum, the majority would dominate the minority and that would surface less as conflict on social media?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

ccarella 🟪 pfp
ccarella 🟪
@ccarella.eth
I have DMd every single voter this morning. People aren’t feeling they are in camps and the external drama has almost no effect on how people are feeling. Most people are energized by the engagement and the process. People told me why they didn’t like the prop but only one person told me they gad a meta issue.
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions

timdaub 🥝/🫦 pfp
timdaub 🥝/🫦
@timdaub.eth
I observed at least two or three camps here on FC: - Those that supported the proposal - Those that want to send more money elsewhere (e.g. to devs) (hard no) - Those that had concerns with the proposal (they wanted adjustments, soft no)
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction