Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
https://frame.weponder.io/api/polls/6182
14 replies
18 recasts
63 reactions
Caden Chase
@cbxm
absolutely not. you think music just falls out of a coconut tree? "pure" is a fallacy: knowing ANYTHING interferes with "pure appreciation of music" and beside the premise itself being impossible, i have a person conviction that the opposite is true.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
I def don't think music falls out of a tree. I used "pure" because I believe that appreciating music often involves a human connection with the artist. Understanding who they are as a person and their experiences enhances the connection to their music https://warpcast.com/ghostlinkz.eth/0x62cdb123
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Caden Chase
@cbxm
I believe your clarification of "pure", AND I want to take my own argument even further: if anything, you cannot have a "pure appreciation" for any piece of music, UNLESS you know everything about the artist and the reasons the song was composed how it was.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
This is true. Adding pure wasn't necessary, but at least we are emphasizing that without knowing much about the artists, you can't really claim to fully appreciate the music
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Caden Chase
@cbxm
lol yes. and this discussion could also benefit from a clarification about the difference between 'appreciation' and 'enjoyment' I enjoy a LOT of music far more because I do not know the backstory
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
That's an interesting perspective. Do you think enjoyment is more about being in the moment with the music, while appreciation involves understanding the backstory and having access to source material?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction