Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Cassie Heart pfp
Cassie Heart
@cassie
https://eprint.iacr.org/2024/555
7 replies
4 recasts
122 reactions

EulerLagrange.eth pfp
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
Haven’t read the whole thing yet, but they found a polynomial time algorithm for lattice problems? Doesn’t that throw into question that entire path to post quantum security?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Julie B. pfp
Julie B.
@bbjubjub.eth
WE ARE BACK
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Göktuğ pfp
Göktuğ
@azriel
Is this related with web3 or not
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
the world does not deserve you 10000 $degen ty
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

blzn pfp
blzn
@blzn
We still need time to confirm it
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

bchow pfp
bchow
@bchow
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Pete Horne pfp
Pete Horne
@horneps
The problem I have with the quantum solutions to polynomial and basically trap door problems is that they assume the quantum solutions are already tractable - which they are not. They are a statement that says the solution is known for the infeasibility proof which to me is just a restatement of the proof.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction