Content
@
https://www.quilibrium.com
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cassie Heart
@cassie
I expect this to get a little bit of controversy so I wanted to start the discussion now: Quilibrium’s codebase needs a license. We want to choose one that prevents Amazon grift — AWS should not be allowed to deploy an alt net either as a service or to power their own infra, but they are free to join the mainnet.
3 replies
1 recast
8 reactions
Branksy Pop
@branksypop
wdym ?! I was hoping to make QuilCash, LiteQuil AND QuilDoge 🐶 ...all at the same time some POV : - nice to be able to contribute on a tool that has no restrictions - base protocol vs apps on top may have different licences - a lot of infra may really benefit from the base protocol (other than aws)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cassie Heart
@cassie
The ultimate goal is to replace AWS and similar. If AWS can simply migrate their own infra to it with a private coin, the battle is lost. The license of the protocol should be independent of the license of the applications built on top of it.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Cassie Heart
@cassie
Core components are already licensed differently, some more restrictive than others, but inheriting from the libraries on which it depends. At a minimum, the license for Quilibrium itself must be GPL, because it depends on GPL’d code.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Cassie Heart
@cassie
Realistically, what I’m looking for is a “fuck you, Amazon” version of the GPL spirit
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions