Another day, another time I've got to tap the sign

Another day, another time I've got to tap the sign https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2024/12/new-badram-attack-neuters-security-assurances-in-amd-epyc-processors/

BDFL of Quilibrium, Eng @ Farcaster, ex-Coinbase, always opinionated, never hydrated

/quilibrium

This continues to be the thing that makes the least sense to me.

We know the T stands for Trusted and that Trusted doesn’t mean the same thing as Trustworthy, right?

Rated 💯 by multiple networks. Fluent in /unglish. Unbothered by /whatday of the week it is.

Allegedly a designer.

They do a lot of marketing to try to convince people they are. The reality is while TEEs have a place for defense in depth, being the core of a security model is broken by design. The shift in marketing to sell TEEs for "confidential compute" is the scariest thing I've seen in the space, mostly because people are falling for it.

how do we operate in the a TEE world, if that's whats going to be the "thing"?

As a generally unqualified person, it had me chasing my tail for a bit trying to figure out why anyone thinks it is a good stand-in. 

Which seems to be primarily how it is sold. eg. “snarks before they are economical”