carter

@carter

264 Following

1398 Followers

carter pfp

oooo already solid colors and shape though, that looks delicious

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

carter pfp

yeah those kind of point to something off with the initial connection and wagmi- it might be worth tossing transaction logging into the frontend with the chainId and everything so when it happens in the future people can hopefully send you some extract info also if you dm me the failed tx I can simulate it to see

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

carter pfp

without looking at code or anything first guess is a timing issue for the farcaster sdk interaction with wagmi like if wagmi grabs the incorrect address / account somehow then farcaster connects but the underlying wagmi account isn't updated (possible account mismatch, chain mismatch, etc) if you simulate that error tx does it work? or does it throw the same error? and does the `from` address match the account that's expected

1 reply

1 recast

2 reactions

carter pfp

woodworking or sourdough

3 replies

0 recast

1 reaction

carter pfp

missed this, would love to join!

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

carter pfp

gl ive been training against the local squirrels every year and have reached peak garden defense performance

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

carter pfp

took 4 years but the (thornless) raspberry plants are finally producing tons of delicious berries

4 replies

1 recast

37 reactions

carter pfp

if you're a registered Seattle resident, remember to use your democracy vouchers! every resident gets 4 $25 vouchers that they can donate to any participating candidate running for a city of Seattle office primaries are in August and these can really help local campaigns https://www.seattle.gov/democracyvoucher

0 reply

1 recast

3 reactions

carter pfp

you mean in the constructor? they'll be named in the final version (and are in the current release) this was more just examples. but also a good callout!

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

carter pfp

thanks! any reasons why 3 over 1, and what you prefer about them?

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

carter pfp

yeah i was going back and forth on this because `deploy` is such a serious action. but also if someone is loading up a hot wallet i think it's reasonable to assume they've tested their code (or at least not something i should be defending against in sdk design) i could also make the onchain enactment a separate fn:

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

carter pfp

nice, any specific reason why? easier to understand/more typescripty/etc?

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

carter pfp

yeah you're right this would do a number on tree-shaking (which also hadn't been a thought/priority here so that's good feedback!) yeah the class probably needs to be top level, I'm not sure of a more ergonomic way to make it available. priorities for this release are ease-of-use for the sdk and getting v4 out there

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

carter pfp

ohh interesting, does that still hold if you set up the sdk like this?

2 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

carter pfp

alright what do you prefer here

12 replies

2 recasts

27 reactions

carter pfp

hi! all good, it should be claimable from the frame when the tops are released https://farcaster.xyz/miniapps/xsYsb9PcyPb8/degen

0 reply

1 recast

2 reactions

lily pfp

@lobstermindset.eth

if someone isn’t launching with clanker it’s just bc they’re confused talk to us, get less confused

4 replies

4 recasts

26 reactions

carter pfp

dont you worry it’s always $1.98 somewhere

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

carter pfp

we’re getting this in Seattle soon! passed in 2022 for a 2027 implementation. really can’t wait and also wish we had this in general

1 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

carter pfp

dumb presidents, back then https://x.com/sentdefender/status/1936622288167928123?s=46

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions