Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Micah
@micah
Am I the only one who was never attracted to the concept of Blast L2? I never liked Blur, and Blast does not seem innovative in any way to me whatsoever. Just a pool of airdrop farming and degeneracy. Nothing cool being built there. The $62m being held hostage by a North Korean was the icing on the cake.
14 replies
0 recast
8 reactions
cappy
@cappy
I don't think that's a fair assessment, there's definitely cool stuff being built there... and using native ETH yield and Shared Transaction Fee Revenue are both innovative and help scale ETH in a strong direction
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
cappy
@cappy
As for the theft by Munchables...exploits in dApps is by no means unique to Blast as a chain. The fact that Pacman coordinated full return of $62 million in Blast eth in under 24 hours is bullish tbqf
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Micah
@micah
i'm not going to blame Blast on the protocol that couldn't do a proper audit, sure. But Blast had to freeze and prevent the liquid from leaving its L2 which goes against decentralization I'm not a decentralization maxi but it goes against ETH antithesis Also afaik Zach had the biggest hand not Pacman
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
cappy
@cappy
L2s sort of a different ballgame in that regard. Gating stolen L2 funds from ETH exchange doesn't fundamentally threaten the concept of decentralization imo, L1 ETH is pretty much unbothered while 62mil returns to rightful owners... I dunno, from a security perspective I can get widdit
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Micah
@micah
Yeah it's not threatening ETH mainnet by any means for sure Meh, Blast is what it is. I just don't like it, period. Never did. I never liked Blur either and I used it too because I didn't have a choice sometimes. Kinda sucks but it is what it is
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
