Danica Swanson
@danicaswanson
I think this depends more on the specifics of the small group than the number of members. I'd say group chats of *any* size need responsible stewardship and (human) moderation if they expect to hold people's attention over time. That's especially true if the goal is to create a space that feels safe enough for deep dives. If I were starting a small group "from scratch" and wanted a ballpark figure to start with? Maybe 15 or 20. Still, this is heavily context-dependent. Some groups would be untenable with 10; others might be manageable with 40, or even 50. A few things to consider: - How well do the members know and trust each other? - What kind of posting cadence do you expect? - Are lurkers welcome, or is there an expectation that everyone will post? - Do you plan to discuss controversial topics regularly? Et cetera.
3 replies
1 recast
7 reactions
Camila ๐ซ
@camilags
I agree with all points. I also think that the topic is very important. Depending on what is being discussed, more moderation will be needed. What also helps is to have some basic rules of interaction to start with.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Danica Swanson
@danicaswanson
Agreed. I touched on that with the point about controversial topics, but really the list of things to consider for effective small group facilitation is quite long. Good communities are not easy to build! And they usually degrade over time if they don't have ongoing maintenance.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction