Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
gm 4 events sponsored 6 grant rounds paid to roughly the same people 7 props w/o outcomes 10 procedural props 11 one-off projects This is @purple so far. It’s fine, but I think we can do better. Vote today so we can figure out how to do more 🫡 https://www.alphacaster.xyz/dao/purple-publicgoods/prop/37
5 replies
9 recasts
32 reactions
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
It’s also important to notice we haven’t done a single thing to review the efficacy of our efforts so far. If you’re curious about what has been spent, check out this list and decide for yourself if we’ve been succeeding in our mission https://www.alphacaster.xyz/dao/purple-publicgoods
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Mac Budkowski (🥝,🥄)
@macbudkowski
Speaking on behalf of "the same people" as we got one grant and applied for another one: This doesn't need to be a bug, can sometimes be a feature as well :) If ppl know they have chances of getting funded again, they can say 'okay lets skip other projects and invest more time in this one to make it really good' 🫡
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
ccarella
@ccarella.eth
Kind of a messed up way to downplay and shit on our hard work. From a cast to 56 Eth deployed to builders who weren’t a good fit for VC, bootstrap or other funding models. Seems pretty good to me.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
nintynick 🧢
@nintynick.eth
Pretty cool! After permissionless sign ups are live, and FC user base grows another 5-10x, how much funding do you think Purple could effectively distribute?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
🖖
@accountless.eth
what ab the partridge? the pear tree?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
