Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
brileigh
@brileigh
there’s a certain irony to marketing FC as a place to make money to people on twitter it’s not that it’s incorrect.. whether you cast and get rewards or were early to FC coins like $degen or $clanker but the traders with real money are purposefully not on purple app because it is typically** counter signal to opportunity (memecoins, solana, perps, etc.) and don’t get me started on cultural differences 💀 But to normies on Twitter, Instagram, etc. Yeah sure, you definitely will make money in ways you may have struggled to. I guess it’s just different target audiences with a similar goal
4 replies
0 recast
9 reactions
six
@six
I would put the difference as between *earning money* and *trading*. Specifically the ability on Farcaster to go from 0 to N, from doing things you would’ve done anyways CT is very lucrative but trading is a different type of income and requires initial capital, which is a meaningful differentiation imo for defining the Farcaster value prop/narrative
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Catch0x22
@catch0x22.eth
not everyone gets to make money and can't be friends with everyone traders with real size are not vocal on twitter lol and the cultures are different because of focus/goals a lot of ppl on fc already made it
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
nicholas 🧨
@nicholas
lolol brutal
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
"money" is a broad enough incentive with many layers. airdrop farmers care about money differently than traders care about money differently than creators care about money differently than founders care about money differently than VCs care about money. but all care about money, and FC kinda addresses it all.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
