Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Noun 40 pfp
Noun 40
@noun40
discourse around DUNA seems to be focused around the downsides (added KYC requirement to grantees) imo DUNA's massive upsides are: - reducing tax risk - providing limited legal liability to members while still allowing: - members to remain anonymous (privacy) - explicit voting rights to members if there are other avenues to achieve the above without any compromises then that would be wonderful, but as far as i know at the moment DUNA is unique in offering the above properties with limited compromises (paying taxes in the US, KYC req for grantees). more thoughts continued šŸ‘‡
7 replies
55 recasts
70 reactions

bradq   pfp
bradq
@bradq
Clear and helpful as usual. Thanks for the explanation. Maybe this has been said in the discussion somewhere else but is there any web3 entity/dao of note using DUNA or would Nouns be pioneering the use for this type of org?
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

Noun 40 pfp
Noun 40
@noun40
we would be the first šŸ˜… nouns pushing the frontier
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Leo pfp
Leo
@leohenkels
@midao has been pushing the frontier with DAOs for over 2 years. Over 200 DAOs registered including Moon DAO, Pyth, and Meta DAO. Would love to chat with the Nouns community about the RMI DAO LLC as a potential option and provide a bit more context about DAO legal entities in general.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction