Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

BPetes pfp
BPetes
@bpetes.eth
If we think the future of DAOs uses Farcaster. I notice that FC is moslty signed-offchain data. Should we keep referring to DAOs as 'onchain organizations' then? I see value in the meme given last cycle's offchain garbage but can we start calling them 'crypto organizations'? https://warpcast.com/bpetes.eth/0x7623dbe8
7 replies
1 recast
7 reactions

Trigs pfp
Trigs
@trigs
Onchain signatures for offchain data is still onchain, no? 😁
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

BPetes pfp
BPetes
@bpetes.eth
Not sure I follow. The messages in FC hubs are signed by private keys 🔑 that happen to be the same private keys you can use to onchain stuff but it is completely offchain.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Trigs pfp
Trigs
@trigs
Yeah I guess there's nuance to that distinction, but it still seems valid to say there is an onchain layer, even if a significant portion of activity happens offchain.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction